My Cart
Your Cart 0

    Your cart is empty.

  • Total (Amount) ₹0.00
NCERT · Class 11 · English

Chapter 4: The Adventure of the Three Garridebs

Practice each question, then open the answer or worked solution.

Discuss the following in pairs or in a small groups

3 questions
Q1Written answer

‘It was worth a wound – It was worth many wounds – to know the depth of loyalty and love that lay behind that cold mask’ – how does this comment throw light on the kind of relationship between Holmes and Watson?

Show solutionHide solution
Worked solution

Watson made this expression on being shot by Killer Evans on his thigh. He was led to a chair to sit by Holmes when he got shot, who, with great concern, questioned him if he was hurt. Watson said that for the first time, Holme’s hard eyes were dimmed, and his firm lips were shaking. So he conveyed that it was worth a wound, worth many wounds, in order to understand the depth of love and loyalty which lies behind that cold mask. Watson and Holmes shared a professional relationship. Even though it had grown into a friendship which ran much deeper than it looked. Watson, at this moment, got a glance of a great heart and a great brain.

Q2Written answer

The cleverest of criminals leave behind clues to their crime.

Show solutionHide solution
Worked solution

It is true that even the best criminals leave clues behind to their crimes. John Garrideb tried hard to work out things and created a foolproof plan in which anybody would have fallen. Anyways, Holmes was able to understand this with his cleverness. He was in search of loose ends and caught Garrideb at different stages where he got confirmed of his false identity, and the loopholes in his plans were clearly seen. When he pretended to be an American at first, he got caught because of his British looks. When Dr Starr was mentioned by Holmes, it was visible that Garrideb did not do the homework that he answered with such conviction as if Dr Starr was real. The advertisement in which he got published was not properly edited, and the language used was easily found to be American English. Even though Killer Evans had a well-curated plan, he was not able to fool Holmes.

Q3Written answer

How did Holmes digressions sometimes prove in the end to have a bearing on the matter on hand? Discuss this with reference to all the apparently irrelevant points he was trying to gather information from.

Show solutionHide solution
Worked solution

It is a sure thing that many detectives very often deviate from the actual question. It might be surprising to others. The case with Sherlock Holmes was the same. While on a visit to a cave, he seemed to deviate from the main objective. For instance, he would want a person to be interrogated about the plans and, anyways, would ask him about nationality and have a conversation about his attire. It would be difficult for the person to understand what Holmes was progressing at when he was clearing the mystery in his mind. He would never run a background check on a person by directly questioning him. He would act like he knew a person from the vicinity of the suspect and say his name to find out if the person was truthful about his background. The suspect would not be able to realise and would fall for the bait by telling about how well he knows the person, while the person does not even exist in reality. Holmes would do his inspection of the matter in such a way that the suspect would not even notice it.