Difficulty distribution
How the classified questions are distributed by difficulty.
Your cart is empty.
Practice Routing and IPv4 - Computer Networks - Computer Science & Information Technology previous year questions organised from real papers, with year-wise coverage and clear topic navigation.
Every graph below is calculated only from this selection.
Year-wise coverage for Routing and IPv4. Each bar uses a separate theme-derived color.
How the classified questions are distributed by difficulty.
MCQ, numerical, multiple-select and other formats found in these papers.
Top subjects by unique question coverage.
Top topics across the included previous year papers.
Top subtopics inside this exact selection.
Question coverage for the most populated papers. Every active PYP paper remains listed below.
Newest papers appear first. Sort by year, question coverage or name.
| Paper | Year / session | Questions in this view | Open |
|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2025 [Session 1] | 2025 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2024 [Session 1] | 2024 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2023 [Session 2] | 2023 | 2 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2022 [Session 2] | 2022 | 2 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2021 [Session 2] | 2021 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2017 [Session 2] | 2017 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2015 [Session 2] | 2015 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2014 [Session 3] | 2014 | 1 | View paper |
| Computer Science & Information Technology (CS) 2010 | 2010 | 2 | View paper |
Practice every matching question in batches of 20, with every available option.

Suppose the weights of all unused links in the previous question are changed to 2 and the distance vector algorithm is used again until all routing tables stabilize. How many links will now remain unused?
| Prefix | Output Interface Identifier |
|---|---|
| 131.16.0.0/ 12 | 3 |
| 131.28.0.0/ 14 | 5 |
| 131.19.0.0/ 16 | 2 |
| 131.22.0.0/ 15 | 1 |

| Network No. | Net Mask | Next Hop |
|---|---|---|
| 128.96.170.0 | 255.255.254.0 | Interface 0 |
| 128.96.168.0 | 255.255.254.0 | Interface 1 |
| 128.96.166.0 | 255.255.254.0 | R2 |
| 128.96.164.0 | 255.255.252.0 | R3 |
| 0.0.0.0 | Default | R4 |
| Group I | Group II |
|---|---|
| i) 128.96.171.92 | a) Interface 0 |
| ii) 128.96.167.151 | b) Interface 1 |
| iii) 128.96.163.151 | c) R2 |
| iv) 128.96.165.121 | d) R3 |
| e) R4 |


Consider routing table of an organization’s router shown below:
| Subnet Number | Subnet Mask | Next Hop |
|---|---|---|
| 12.20.164.0 | 255.255.252.0 | R1 |
| 12.20.170.0 | 255.255.254.0 | R2 |
| 12.20.168.0 | 255.255.254.0 | Interface 0 |
| 12.20.166.0 | 255.255.254.0 | Interface 1 |
| default | R3 |

| Subnet Number | Subnet Mask | Interface ID |
|---|---|---|
| 200.150.0.0 | 255.255.0.0 | 1 |
| 200.150.64.0 | 255.255.224.0 | 2 |
| 200.150.68.0 | 255.255.255.0 | 3 |
| 200.150.68.64 | 255.255.255.224 | 4 |
| Default | 0 |
| Prefix | Next hop router | |
|---|---|---|
| 10.1.1.0/24 | R1 | |
| 10.1.1.128/25 | R2 | |
| 10.1.1.64/26 | R3 | |
| 10.1.1.192/26 | R4 |