The following table shows distribution of workforce in India for the year 1972-73. Analyse it and give reasons for the nature of workforce distribution. You will notice that the data is pertaining to the situation in India 30 years ago
| Place of Residence | Workforce (in millions) | ||
| Male | Female | Total | |
| Rural
Urban |
125
32 |
69
7 |
195
39 |
(i) In the above-mentioned table, the total workforce in the year 1972-73 was 234 million, which comprised a workforce of 195 million from the rural population and 39 million from the urban population. This shows that 83% of the total workforce was rural-based while the remaining 17% was from the urban population, which is an indicator of the involvement of the bulk of the rural population in agriculture and allied sectors.
(ii) Rural workforce composition was 64% male and 36% female. Whereas in the urban population, it was 82% male workers and 18% female workers. This shows that the level of participation of males in both urban and rural populations was higher than females, as there were fewer opportunities for women’s education. Society’s structure was such that it discouraged females from taking up a job.
(iii) It can be seen that the women workforce in rural areas was 36% while it is 18% for urban women. The majority of the rural population was agriculture based or, in some allied activities, still had low productivity. Less productivity leads to poverty.
Show solutionHide solution
From the above data, it can be concluded that 30 years back, the Indian economy was in a state of acute unemployment and poverty. There was disguised unemployment in agriculture and a low level of female participation in the workforce.


