Difficulty distribution
How the classified questions are distributed by difficulty.
Your cart is empty.
Practice Facility Design - Industrial Engineering - Production & Industrial Engineering previous year questions organised from real papers, with year-wise coverage and clear topic navigation.
Every graph below is calculated only from this selection.
Year-wise coverage for Facility Design. Each bar uses a separate theme-derived color.
How the classified questions are distributed by difficulty.
MCQ, numerical, multiple-select and other formats found in these papers.
Top subjects by unique question coverage.
Top topics across the included previous year papers.
Top subtopics inside this exact selection.
Question coverage for the most populated papers. Every active PYP paper remains listed below.
Newest papers appear first. Sort by year, question coverage or name.
| Paper | Year / session | Questions in this view | Open |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2025 | 2025 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2024 | 2024 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2023 | 2023 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2022 | 2022 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2021 | 2021 | 2 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2019 | 2019 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2016 | 2016 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2013 [Session 4] | 2013 | 1 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2010 | 2010 | 2 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2009 | 2009 | 2 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2008 | 2008 | 3 | View paper |
| Production & Industrial Engineering (PI) 2007 | 2007 | 2 | View paper |
Practice every matching question in batches of 20, with every available option.
| Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|
| P - SLP | 1 - Intellectual property system |
| Q - Margin of Safety | 2 - Assembly line balancing |
| R - LOB | 3 - Facility design |
| S - TRIPS | 4 - Break even analysis |
| Group I (Layout types) | Group II (Layout characteristics) |
|---|---|
| P. Process layout | 1. Inflexible to significant changes in product design |
| Q. Product flow layout | 2. Distinct part families and expanded worker training |
| R. Fixed position layout | 3. Low equipment utilization and high skill requirement |
| S. Cellular layout | 4. Large work-in-process and increased material handling |
| Operation | Precedence | Processing time (in min) |
|---|---|---|
| P | none | 1 |
| Q | P | 2 |
| R | P | 4 |
| S | Q, R | 3 |

Which one of the following is an improvement type heuristic algorithm for computerized layout design technique?
| Factor | Factor weight | Score for site (out of 100) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| Average community income | 0.4 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 50 |
| Demand growth potential | 0.1 | 30 | 80 | 50 | 40 |
| Proximity to existing store | 0.3 | 50 | 10 | 40 | 60 |
| Availability of public transport | 0.2 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 20 |
| Type of layout | Type of production | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P | Process layout | 1 | Job production |
| Q | Product layout | 2 | Batch production |
| R | Fixed position layout | 3 | Mass production |
There are four locations (P, Q, R, S) and four factors to be considered for setting up a facility. The scores (on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the maximum) for the given locations and the weight assigned to each factor are given as
| Factor | Weight | P | Q | R | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Availability of raw material | 0.4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Availability of skilled labor | 0.3 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 6 |
| Infrastructure | 0.2 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 8 |
| Proximity to market | 0.1 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 |

