My Cart
Your Cart 0

    Your cart is empty.

  • Total (Amount) ₹0.00
Previous year question hub

Logic - General Aptitude (GA) Previous Year Questions

Practice Logic - General Aptitude (GA) previous year questions organised from real papers, with year-wise coverage and clear topic navigation.

10Papers
10Years
19Questions
1Topics

Logic question pattern

Every graph below is calculated only from this selection.

Questions by year

Year-wise coverage for Logic. Each bar uses a separate theme-derived color.

Difficulty distribution

How the classified questions are distributed by difficulty.

Easy 11 57.9%
Medium 8 42.1%

Question type distribution

MCQ, numerical, multiple-select and other formats found in these papers.

MCQ 19 100%

Subject weightage

Top subjects by unique question coverage.

General Aptitude (GA)
19 Qs

Most asked topics

Top topics across the included previous year papers.

Logic
19 Qs

Subtopic coverage

Top subtopics inside this exact selection.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
17 Qs
Numerical Relations and Analogies
1 Qs
Family Relationships
1 Qs

Paper coverage

Question coverage for the most populated papers. Every active PYP paper remains listed below.

Architecture and Planning (AR) 2026
2 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2023
2 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2022
3 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2021
1 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2020
1 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2019
2 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2017
2 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2016
3 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2014
2 Qs
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2012
1 Qs

Browse by subtopics

Open a focused page built from the same verified paper data.

Included previous year papers

Newest papers appear first. Sort by year, question coverage or name.

PaperYear / sessionQuestions in this viewOpen
Architecture and Planning (AR) 202620262View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 202320232View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 202220223View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 202120211View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 202020201View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 201920192View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 201720172View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 201620163View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 201420142View paper
Architecture and Planning (AR) 201220121View paper

Sample previous year questions

A varied preview from the papers represented in this selection, with every available option.

1
2012 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2012

Ravi is taller than Arun but shorter than Iqbal. Sam is shorter than Ravi. Mohan is shorter than Arun. Balu is taller than Mohan and Sam. The tallest person can be

Open complete paper
2
2014 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2014
Rajan was not happy that Sajan decided to do the project on his own. On observing his unhappiness, Sajan explained that Rajan preferred to work independently.
Which one of the statements below is logically valid and can be inferred from the above sentences?
Open complete paper
3
2016 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Family Relationships
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2016

M has a son Q and a daughter R. He has no other children. E is the mother of P and daughter-in-law of M. How is P related to M?

Open complete paper
4
2017 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2017
P, Q, and R talk about S’s car collection. P states that S has at least 3 cars. Q believes that S has less than 3 cars. R indicates that to his knowledge, S has at least one car. Only one of P, Q and R is right. The number of cars owned by S is
Open complete paper
5
2019 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2019
Some students were not involved in the strike.
If the above statement is true, which of the following conclusions is/are logically necessary?
1. Some who were involved in the strike were students.
2. No student was involved in the strike.
3. At least one student was involved in the strike.
4. Some who were not involved in the strike were students.
Open complete paper
6
2020 · General Aptitude (GA) · Logic · Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Architecture and Planning (AR) 2020
P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W are seated around a circular table. I. S is seated opposite to W. II. U is seated at the second place to the right of R. III. T is seated at the third place to the left of R. IV. V is a neighbour of S. Which of the following must be true?
Open complete paper