Ans: The arguments for social responsibilities are:
Arguments for Social Responsibility
It has become critical for businesses to fulfil their obligations to their employees in order to win their support. The consumer does not purchase the product that is being offered to him. He buys exactly what he wants. Businesses have been compelled to adopt social responsiveness toward their customers as a result of greater customer awareness. As a result, keeping social obligations is beneficial to a company's long-term viability.
When a company's primary purpose is to provide "service to society," it and its image stand to profit the most in the long run. If a company performs its social obligation, it benefits itself. Also the image of the firm in the eyes of the people also improves,when the firm fulfils social goals.
Businesses are motivated to work for the greater good as their degree of knowledge and understanding of their role as society's creators increases. Managers adopt and follow voluntary moral and social responsibility norms, which help to shape public expectations. Hence, firms assume social responsibility on their own, rather than as a result of legislative intrusion.
Regulations from the government are unwelcomed since they restrict one's freedom. Businessmen are thought to be able to escape the problem of government restrictions by voluntarily taking on social duties, hence reducing the need for new legislations.
The Central Pollution Control Board, for example, is in charge of environmental pollution issues.
Business organizations have vast resources that can be leveraged to help solve societal problems in part. Therefore, given the vast financial and personnel resources at its disposal, a firm can assist society in better addressing its problems. Also, businesses are the result of society's creation, and they must act in its best interests, both economically and socially.
Businesses have either generated or perpetuated social problems. Therefore, instead of ignoring these issues, businesses have a moral obligation to be actively involved in their solution rather than only anticipating that they will be dealt with by other social agencies.
By accepting the challenge, business, which has a history of turning difficult situations into profitable agreements, may not only alleviate societal problems, but also make them successfully helpful.
Arguments Against Social Responsibility:
Violation of profit maximisation:
Profit maximisation is the sole purpose of business. As a result, any discussion of social responsibility is incompatible with this goal. Profit maximisation through higher efficiency and lower costs is the best way for business to fulfil its social obligation.
Burden on consumers:
Pollution management and environmental preservation are expensive social duties that frequently necessitate large financial investments. Instead of carrying the burden of social duty, business people tend to simply pass it to their customers by demanding higher costs.
Lack of social skills:
Business people lack the essential knowledge and training to solve social issues. Instead, other specialized agencies need to deal with social issues.
Lack of broad public support:
Business engagement or meddling in social programmes is disliked by the general public. As a result, business cannot thrive due to a lack of public trust and collaboration in resolving social issues.